What I've did is this, I've broken his starts down into three categories and then checked the Royals W/L record for each category. And I'm just looking at innings and earned runs, the final result of each start without regard to hits, strikeouts, and walks. So take it for what it's worth. Anyway, here are the three categories:
- Quality starts - This is defined (6+ innings and 3 earned runs or less) and a fairly accepted way to judge a pitcher.
- Serviceable starts - I don't know of any attempts to define these as they seem like something that can be open to interpretation. A serviceable start to me is one that is not a quality start but not downright awful either. So I think 5+ innings and 4 earned runs or less work as a starting point.
- Ugly starts - They are how they sound, these are the starts where a pitcher goes less than 5 innings and/or gives up 5 earned runs. I think that works, I mean a line has to be drawn somewhere and drawing it between 4 and 5 runs sounds right.
| Year | Quality Starts | W/L | Ugly Starts | W/L | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 8 | 5-3 | 8 | 4-4 | 5 | 2-3 |
| 2009 | 9 | 5-4 | 7 | 5-2 | 6 | 1-5 |
| 2010 | 14 | 10-4 | 10 | 3-7 | 8 | 3-5 |
| 2011 | 0 | 0-0 | 1 | 1-0 | 1 | 0-1 |
| Total | 31 | 20-11 | 26 | 13-13 | 20 | 6-14 |
I'll be honest here, I expected a lot more than 26% of his starts to be the ugly variety. He's been extremely consistent too as his US percentages from 2008-2010 are 23, 27, and 25. So I see no reason not to expect more of the same this year, he'll be decent in three-fourths of his starts and the team will be around .500 when he pitches.
Davies is an acceptable starter for a Royals team not in win now mode. Which means I don't mind him getting 30 starts this year, but just this year and not in 2012.
5 comments:
Great analysis. I wouldn't mind him starting in 2012, so long as he was down to either 4 or 5 in the rotation. At #3, those numbers aren't acceptable for a team looking to compete, but not too bad at #5 in the rotation (unless you're Philly).
Maybe if he's a #5 and isn't blocking Lamb or somebody I could probably live with it for another year.
Like the idea of "serviceable" start vs. quality and ugly starts..
I'm just as fine with Davies as a 5th starter as I am with Chen and Hoch as 5th starters...except they're not 5th starters on the Royals.
I still reserve a bit of hope for Hoch and I've accepted what Chen is, but Davies has frustrated for the longest, so he's where my ire is usually directed.
Even though Hochevar has a higher ugly start percentage (38%) I have more faith in him figuring things out than I do Davies. I'm cautiously optimistic regarding Chen.
Post a Comment