Cabrera, meanwhile, has been an everyday player since the age of 21. Whether he deserved to be or not is open to interpretation. Here's his yearly OPS+ numbers.
| Year | Age | PA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 20 | 19 | 14 |
| 2006 | 21 | 524 | 95 |
| 2007 | 22 | 612 | 88 |
| 2008 | 23 | 453 | 68 |
| 2009 | 24 | 540 | 93 |
| 2010 | 25 | 509 | 83 |
| 2011 | 26 | 563 | 123 |
Besides Cabrera, there were only 25 other players.
| Rk | Player | PA | From | To | Age | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jose Lopez | 89 | 2977 | 2004 | 2009 | 20-25 |
| 2 | Jose Oquendo | 89 | 2202 | 1983 | 1989 | 19-25 |
| 3 | Steve Sax | 89 | 2691 | 1981 | 1985 | 21-25 |
| 4 | Ron Hansen | 89 | 2038 | 1958 | 1963 | 20-25 |
| 5 | Don Money | 88 | 2097 | 1968 | 1972 | 21-25 |
| 6 | Ed Kranepool | 88 | 3217 | 1962 | 1970 | 17-25 |
| 7 | Luis Castillo | 87 | 2449 | 1996 | 2001 | 20-25 |
| 8 | Rick Manning | 87 | 3227 | 1975 | 1980 | 20-25 |
| 9 | Bill Russell | 87 | 2533 | 1969 | 1974 | 20-25 |
| 10 | Kurt Stillwell | 86 | 2342 | 1986 | 1990 | 21-25 |
| 11 | Bill Mazeroski | 86 | 3792 | 1956 | 1962 | 19-25 |
| 12 | Melky Cabrera | 85 | 2657 | 2005 | 2010 | 20-25 |
| 13 | Leo Cardenas | 85 | 2269 | 1960 | 1964 | 21-25 |
| 14 | Glenn Hubbard | 84 | 2633 | 1978 | 1983 | 20-25 |
| 15 | Jerry Remy | 84 | 2488 | 1975 | 1978 | 22-25 |
| 16 | Juan Uribe | 83 | 2337 | 2001 | 2005 | 21-25 |
| 17 | Brian McRae | 83 | 2122 | 1990 | 1993 | 22-25 |
| 18 | Juan Pierre | 82 | 2288 | 2000 | 2003 | 22-25 |
| 19 | Aurelio Rodriguez | 82 | 3521 | 1967 | 1973 | 19-25 |
| 20 | Tony Taylor | 82 | 2320 | 1958 | 1961 | 22-25 |
| 21 | Corey Patterson | 81 | 2335 | 2000 | 2005 | 20-25 |
| 22 | Derrel Thomas | 81 | 2514 | 1971 | 1976 | 20-25 |
| 23 | Luis Rivas | 80 | 2056 | 2000 | 2005 | 20-25 |
| 24 | Bucky Dent | 80 | 2512 | 1973 | 1977 | 21-25 |
| 25 | Dalton Jones | 80 | 2006 | 1964 | 1969 | 20-25 |
| 26 | Mike Hershberger | 80 | 2109 | 1961 | 1965 | 21-25 |
Next I checked every player's age 26 OPS+ to see how many managed a 120 or higher. Only two players on the above list accomplished this - Ed Kranepool and Steve Sax.
Kranepool had a 124 OPS+ in 1971, this number would end up being a career high. He posted a 110 OPS+ at 27 and would later hit 120 twice more in his career. However none of these - including his 26 and 27 years - were accomplished in a 500 PA season. So he's not the ideal Cabrera comp since he wasn't a full time player when he busted out or after.
Sax had a 137 OPS+ in 1986, like Kranepool this would be the best season of his career. He slipped back to his career numbers at 27 when he put up a 87 OPS+ in 1987, which is weird since 1987 saw an offensive explosion. He would have just two other seasons above 100 the remainder of his career. From age 27 to the end of his career he had a 92 OPS+, which is close to his pre-26 89. This is not a comp that inspires confidence that Cabrera's emergence can be repeated.
What I think we've learned here is that Cabrera is having an improbable season, though given his career numbers entering 2011 we probably already knew that. But still, I guess I was hoping for a more significant precedent.
Kranepool had a 124 OPS+ in 1971, this number would end up being a career high. He posted a 110 OPS+ at 27 and would later hit 120 twice more in his career. However none of these - including his 26 and 27 years - were accomplished in a 500 PA season. So he's not the ideal Cabrera comp since he wasn't a full time player when he busted out or after.
Sax had a 137 OPS+ in 1986, like Kranepool this would be the best season of his career. He slipped back to his career numbers at 27 when he put up a 87 OPS+ in 1987, which is weird since 1987 saw an offensive explosion. He would have just two other seasons above 100 the remainder of his career. From age 27 to the end of his career he had a 92 OPS+, which is close to his pre-26 89. This is not a comp that inspires confidence that Cabrera's emergence can be repeated.
What I think we've learned here is that Cabrera is having an improbable season, though given his career numbers entering 2011 we probably already knew that. But still, I guess I was hoping for a more significant precedent.
No comments:
Post a Comment